8.
What are the Governments Doing about Climate Change?
Archive of Past Articles for Chapter
8
2009 November 2. E.P.A.
Lawyers Challenge ‘Cap and Trade’ for
Climate. By Andrew C. Revkin, The NY
Times. Excerpt:
When an economist at the Environmental
Protection Agency rejected the Obama
administration’s
stance on global warming by writing
an unsolicited report challenging
the scientific consensus on greenhouse
dangers, groups fighting restrictions
on greenhouse gases hailed him as a
courageous maverick. Climate campaigners
said he was irrelevant and
ill informed.
Now two more functionaries at the
agency — Laurie Williams and
Allan Zabel, who are lawyers and
a married couple — have sharply
criticized the core element of climate
legislation pushed by Democratic
lawmakers and President Obama.
Their views are unlikely to be welcomed
by either side in the political fight.
Like the administration, they say
that human-driven climate change
poses enormous risks; they just completely
reject the cap and trade system
favored by Democratic leaders and
some environmental groups. This system
would force overall emission reductions
but allow flexibility through a market
that trades credits accrued by companies
or institutions that make extra-deep
cuts.
...They argued that the trading system
provides far too much leeway for
dealing in “offsets,” credits
earned by avoiding or preventing
emissions of carbon dioxide. In summary,
they wrote: “Together, the
illusion of greenhouse-gas reductions
and the creation of powerful lobbies
seeking to protect newly created
profits in permits and offsets would
lock in climate degradation for a
decade or more.”...
2009 October 29. China
outperforms US on green issues. By Jim Giles, NewScientist.
Excerpt: China is often accused of
not doing enough to reduce the carbon
dioxide and other pollution pouring
from its factories and coal-fuelled
power stations. But a new report
suggests the country is doing more
to tackle climate change than it
gets credit for: in fact, its environmental
standards surpass the US in some
key measures.
The World Resources Institute (WRI),
a respected environmental think tank
based in Washington DC, says China
is on track to meet its main climate
change target, which is a 20 per
cent reduction in energy intensity – the
amount of energy used per dollar
of gross domestic product – by
the end of next year....
China is also making good progress
towards its goal of generating 15 per
cent of its electricity from renewable
sources by 2020, according to the
report. By the end of the next decade
it will have 150 gigawatts of wind
power installed – over five
times the current US level. One in
10 Chinese homes already has solar
heaters, with the number growing
by 20 per cent per year....
2009 October 14. Arctic
Now Traps 25 Percent of World's
Carbon -- But That Could Change. USGS. Excerpt:
The arctic could potentially alter
the Earth’s climate by becoming
a possible source of global atmospheric
carbon dioxide. The arctic
now traps or absorbs up to 25 percent
of this gas but climate change could
alter that amount, according to a
study published in the November issue
of Ecological Monographs.
In their review paper, David McGuire
of the U.S. Geological Survey and the
University of Alaska at Fairbanks and
his colleagues show that the Arctic
has been a carbon sink since the end
of the last Ice Age, which has recently
accounted for between zero and 25 percent,
or up to about 800 million metric tons,
of the global carbon sink. On average,
says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for
10-15 percent of the Earth’s
carbon sink. But the rapid rate of
climate change in the Arctic – about
twice that of lower latitudes – could
eliminate the sink and instead, possibly
make the Arctic a source of carbon
dioxide....
Carbon generally enters the oceans
and land masses of the Arctic from
the atmosphere and largely accumulates
in permafrost, the frozen layer of
soil underneath the land’s surface.
Unlike active soils, permafrost does
not decompose its carbon; thus, the
carbon becomes trapped in the frozen
soil. Cold conditions at the surface
have also slowed the rate of organic
matter decomposition, McGuire says,
allowing Arctic carbon accumulation
to exceed its release.
But recent warming trends could change
this balance. Warmer temperatures can
accelerate the rate of surface organic
matter decomposition, releasing more
carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
Of greater concern, says McGuire, is
that the permafrost has begun to thaw,
exposing previously frozen soil to
decomposition and erosion. These changes
could reverse the historical role of
the Arctic as a sink for carbon dioxide....
2009 August 7. Glacier
melt accelerating, federal report
concludes. By Jim
Tankersley, LA Times. Excerpt:
...Washington - The federal government
Thursday released the most comprehensive study
of melting glaciers in North America --
and the results show a rapid and
accelerating shrinkage over the last
half a century because of global
warming.
One of the glaciers in the study,
the South Cascade Glacier in Washington
state, has lost nearly half of its
volume and a quarter of its mass
since 1958, scientists from the U.S.
Geological Survey said. The two others
in the study, the Wolverine and Gulkana
glaciers in Alaska, have both lost
nearly 15% of their mass.
In all three cases, the melting has
increased over the last two decades.
The acceleration is the result of
warmer, drier climates in the Pacific
Northwest and Alaska caused by global
warming, the researchers said.
"By having a 50-year record,
you can look over what's going on,
look over the meteorological, climatological
record, and really get an idea of
what's going on in the mountains," said
Edward Josberger, a scientist with
the USGS Washington Water Science
Center in Tacoma, Wash., who has
worked for a decade on the study.
"Climate change effects are
starting to become more and more
noticeable," he added, "and
this is one of the effects that's
being displayed."...
2009 July 16. NASA RELEASE : 09-167.
NASA
Airborne Expedition Chases Arctic
Sea Ice Questions. Excerpt: WASHINGTON
-- A small NASA aircraft completed
its first successful science flight
Thursday as part of an expedition
to study the receding Arctic sea
ice and improve understanding of
its life cycle and the long-term
stability of the Arctic ice cover.
The mission continues through July
24.
NASA's Characterization of Arctic Sea
Ice Experiment, known as CASIE, began
a series of unmanned aircraft system
flights in coordination with satellites.
Working with the University of Colorado
and its research partners, NASA is
using the remotely-piloted aircraft
to image thick, old slabs of ice as
they drift from the Arctic Ocean south
through Fram Strait -- which lies between
Greenland and Svalbard, Norway -- into
the North Atlantic Ocean.
NASA's Science Instrumentation Evaluation
Remote Research Aircraft, or SIERRA,
will weave a pattern over open ocean
and sea ice to map and measure ice
conditions below cloud cover to as
low as 300 feet.
"Our project is attempting to
answer some of the most basic questions
regarding the most fundamental changes
in sea ice cover in recent years," said
James Maslanik, a research professor
at the University of Colorado at Boulder,
and principal investigator for the
NASA mission. "Our analysis of
satellite data shows that in 2009 the
amount of older ice is just 12 percent
of what it was in 1988 -- a decline
of 74 percent. The oldest ice types
now cover only 2 percent of the Arctic
Ocean as compared to 20 percent during
the 1980s."...
2009 July 9. World
powers accept warming limit. BBC News. Excerpt:
Developed and developing nations have
agreed that global temperatures should
not rise more than 2C above 1900 levels,
a G8 summit declaration says.
That is the level above which, the
UN says, the Earth's climate system
would become dangerously unstable.
US President Barack Obama said the
countries had made important strides
in dealing with climate change.
But the G8 failed to persuade developing
countries to accept targets of cutting
emissions by 50% by 2050.
On Wednesday, the G8 agreed its own
members would work towards 80% cuts
by the same date.
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said
the G8 had not done enough and should
also set 2020 targets.
He said that while the G8's Wednesday
agreement was welcome, its leaders
also needed to establish a strong and
ambitious mid-term target for emissions
cuts.
...RK Pachauri, who chairs the Inter-governmental
Panel on Climate Change, praised the
declaration's mention of the 2C limit
but said more details were needed.
"It certainly doesn't give you
a roadmap on how you should get there
but at least they've defined the destination," he
told the BBC World Service Newshour
programme.
...BBC environment analyst Roger Harrabin
says the declaration is a significant
step, with all big countries rich and
poor agreeing there is a scientific
limit on the amount we should warm
the climate.
But there is still a huge way to go,
he says, as developing nations like
India will not sign up to any 2050
targets unless rich nations show more
determination and offer more cash....
2009 June 27. House
Passes Bill to Address Threat of
Climate Change.
By JOHN M. BRODER, NY Times. Excerpt:
The 219-212 vote marked the first
time that either house of Congress
has approved a bill aimed at curbing
the heat-trapping gases scientists
have linked to climate change, and
it
could lead to sweeping changes in
the economy.
2009 June 12. Climate
Change Treaty, to Go Beyond the
Kyoto Protocol, Is Expected by
the Year’s End.
By Elisabeth Rosenthal, The NY Times.
Excerpt: The world is on track to produce
a new global climate treaty by December,
the top United Nations climate official
said Friday as delegates from more
than 100 nations concluded 12 days
of talks in Bonn, Germany.
The delegates issued a 200-page document
that they said would serve as the starting
point for treaty negotiations that
open in Copenhagen in December.
...The goal is a climate treaty that
would go beyond the 1997 Kyoto Protocol,
a climate-change agreement that set
emissions targets for industrialized
nations. Many of those goals have not
been met, and the United States never
ratified the accord.
The document issued Friday outlines
proposals for cutting emissions of
heat-trapping gases by rich countries
and limiting the growth of gases in
the developing world. It also discusses
ways of preventing deforestation, which
is linked to global warming, and of
providing financing for poorer nations
to help them adapt to warmer temperatures.
...environmentalists took heart from
the strong involvement of many nations,
especially the United States and China,
which jointly produce 40 percent of
the world’s heat-trapping emissions.
(In declining to ratify the 1997 Kyoto
Protocol, the United States cited China
and India’s lack of participation.)...
2009 April 27. Clinton
Says U.S. Is Ready to Lead on Climate. By John
M. Broder, The NY Times. Excerpt:
WASHINGTON — After eight years
largely on the sidelines of the international
policy debate on climate change,
the United States is prepared to
lead negotiations toward a new global
warming treaty, Secretary of State
Hillary Rodham Clinton said Monday.
“The United States is fully
engaged and determined to lead and
make up for lost time both at home
and abroad,” Mrs. Clinton told
delegates from 16 countries at a
State Department conference on energy
and climate. “We are back in
the game.”
The meeting in Washington was the
first of three planned sessions among
the participating countries, who
together account for roughly 75 percent
of emissions of the gases blamed
for the heating of the planet....
...Mrs. Clinton said there was no
longer any question that growing
atmospheric concentrations of carbon
dioxide and other gases were causing
a warming of the planet, with potentially
catastrophic results. She said global
climate change posed environmental,
economic, health and security challenges
that must be addressed by individual
countries and by the community of
nations.
Speaking directly to representatives
of developing nations, who are skeptical
of the motives of the United States
and other industrialized countries
on the issue, Mrs. Clinton that the
United States would not seek to limit
the use of energy in the developing
world but would help make it cleaner.
“We want your economies to
grow,” she said as representatives
of Brazil, China, India and Indonesia
listened. “We want your people
to have a higher standard of living.”...
2009 April 6. NASA
RELEASE: 09-079. Satellites Show
Arctic Literally on Thin Ice. Excerpt: WASHINGTON --
The latest Arctic sea ice data from
NASA and the National Snow and Ice
Data Center show that the decade-long
trend of shrinking sea ice cover
is continuing. New evidence from
satellite observations also shows
that the ice cap is thinning as well.
...Scientists who track Arctic sea
ice cover from space announced today
that this winter had the fifth lowest
maximum ice extent on record. The six
lowest maximum events since satellite
monitoring began in 1979 have all occurred
in the past six years (2004-2009).
Until recently, the majority of Arctic
sea ice survived at least one summer
and often several. But things have
changed dramatically, according to
a team of University of Colorado, Boulder,
scientists led by Charles Fowler. Thin
seasonal ice -- ice that melts and
re-freezes every year -- makes up about
70 percent of the Arctic sea ice in
wintertime, up from 40 to 50 percent
in the 1980s and 1990s. Thicker ice,
which survives two or more years, now
comprises just 10 percent of wintertime
ice cover, down from 30 to 40 percent.
According to researchers from the National
Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder,
Colo., the maximum sea ice extent for
2008-09, reached on Feb. 28, was 5.85
million square miles. That is 278,000
square miles less than the average
extent for 1979 to 2000.
"Ice extent is an important measure
of the health of the Arctic, but it
only gives us a two-dimensional view
of the ice cover," said Walter
Meier, research scientist at the center
and the University of Colorado, Boulder. "Thickness
is important, especially in the winter,
because it is the best overall indicator
of the health of the ice cover. As
the ice cover in the Arctic grows thinner,
it grows more vulnerable to melting
in the summer."...
2009 February 17. New
York Must Prepare for Global Warming,
Mayor’s
Panel Says. By Mireya Navarro, The
NY Times. Excerpt: New York City
must prepare for higher temperatures,
more rain and an increased risk of
coastal flooding in the coming decades
as a result of global climate change,
an advisory panel said on Tuesday.
The panel, formed by Mayor Michael
R. Bloomberg to study the potential
effects of global warming on the
city, said that mean annual temperatures
in New York could increase by up
to 3 degrees and the average sea
levels rise by 2 to 5 inches by the
2020s. By the 2080s, temperatures
could increase by up to 7 ½ degrees,
and sea levels could rise 12 to 23
inches by the end of the century,
the panel said.
...City officials said that to prepare
for the expected effects of climate
change, the city should plan to keep
cooling centers for people without
air-conditioning open longer during
heat waves, move critical equipment
in city buildings above sea level
and incorporate climate changes into
the design of buildings, among other
measures.
...“Planning for climate change
today is less expensive than rebuilding
an entire network after the catastrophe,” the
mayor said in response to the report. “We
cannot wait until after our infrastructure
has been compromised to begin to
plan for the effects of climate change
now.”...
2008 July 16. US
EPA Says Greenhouse Emissions Endanger
Health. By Deborah
Zabarenko, Planet Ark. Excerpt: WASHINGTON
- The US Environmental Protection
Agency said on Monday that greenhouse
gas emissions endanger human health,
a critical finding that has languished
in bureaucratic limbo since last
December.
In a 149-page document, the agency's
scientists said that "warming
of the climate system is unequivocal" and
that potential health risks include
more heat waves, floods and droughts,
insect outbreaks and and wildfires,
along with crop failure and decline
in livestock and fisheries productivity.
"This is a long-awaited EPA analysis
that has been kept under wraps by the
White House," said Vickie Patton
of Environmental Defense. "It's
of critical importance because it looks
at the extensive body of science demonstrating
that global warming threatens Americans'
health and well-being."
The document posted on EPA's Web site
was part of the environment agency's
response to an April 2007 Supreme Court
ruling that for the first time found
that greenhouse gases can be regulated
as a pollutant under the US Clean Air
Act...
This information had been sent to the
White House last December by e-mail,
but officials there refused to open
it...
The Bush administration has opposed
economy-wide moves to regulate greenhouse
gas emissions. Both major presidential
candidates, Republican John McCain
and Democrat Barack Obama, have said
they would act to stem climate change.
2008 May 28. New
Climate Report Foresees Big Changes.By
ANDREW C. REVKIN, NY Times. Exerpt:
The rise in concentrations of carbon
dioxide in the atmosphere from
human activities is influencing
climate patterns and vegetation
across the United States and will
significantly disrupt water supplies,
agriculture, forestry and ecosystems
for decades, a new federal report
says.
The changes are unfolding in ways
that are likely to produce an uneven
national map of harms and benefits,
according to the report, released
Tuesday and posted online at climatescience.gov.
The authors of the report and some
independent experts said the main
value of its projections was the
level of detail and the high confidence
in some conclusions. That confidence
comes in part from the report's
emphasis on the next 25 to 50 years,
when shifts in emissions are unlikely
to make much of a difference in
climate trends. The report also
reflects a recent, significant
shift by the Bush administration
on climate science. During Mr.
Bush's first term, administration
officials worked to play down a
national assessment of climate
effects conducted mainly during
the Clinton administration, but
released in 2000.
The new report, which includes
some findings that are more sobering
and definitive than those in the
2000 climate report, holds the
signatures of three cabinet secretaries.
According to the report, Western
states will face substantial challenges
because of growing demand for water
and big projected drops in supplies....
2008
May 14. NASA
STUDY LINKS EARTH IMPACTS TO HUMAN-CAUSED
CLIMATE CHANGE. NASA
RELEASE: 08-127. Excerpt: WASHINGTON
-- A new NASA-led study shows human-caused
climate change has made an impact
on a wide range of Earth's natural
systems, including permafrost thawing,
plants blooming earlier across Europe,
and lakes declining in productivity
in Africa.
Cynthia Rosenzweig of NASA's Goddard
Institute for Space Science in New
York and scientists at 10 other institutions
have linked physical and biological
impacts since 1970 with rises in
temperatures during that period.
The study, to be published May 15
in the journal Nature, concludes
human-caused warming is resulting
in a broad range of impacts across
the globe.
"This is the first study to
link global temperature data sets,
climate model results, and observed
changes in a broad range of physical
and biological systems to show the
link between humans, climate, and
impacts," said Rosenzweig, lead
author of the study. ...Observed
impacts included changes to physical
systems, such as glaciers shrinking,
permafrost melting, and lakes and
rivers warming. Biological systems
also were impacted in a variety of
ways, such as leaves unfolding and
flowers blooming earlier in the spring,
birds arriving earlier during migration
periods, and plant and animal species
moving toward Earth's poles and higher
in elevation. In aquatic environments
such as oceans, lakes, and rivers,
plankton and fish are shifting from
cold-adapted to warm-adapted communities....
30
November 2007. Climate
Change May Cost Florida US$345 Billion
a Year - Tufts Study. PlanetArk
World Environment News. Excerpt:
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - If nothing is done to combat global warming,
two of Florida's nuclear power plants, three of its prisons and
1,362 hotels, motels and inns will be under water by 2100, a
study released Wednesday said. In all, Florida could stand to
lose US$345 billion a year in projected economic activity by
2100 if nothing is done to reduce emissions that are viewed as
the main human contribution to rising global temperatures, according
to the Tufts University study [report,
pdf]...."The status quo, the climate that we have right
now, is not an available option unless we act immediately," said
Frank Ackerman, a professor at Tufts' Global Development and
Environmental Institute and co-author of the study. "Doing
something may seem expensive, but doing nothing will be more
expensive."
...Republican Florida Gov. Charlie
Crist is among a growing list of
state officials who have given up
waiting for the federal government
to take the lead on cutting greenhouse
gas emissions and have passed their
own measures to cap pollution by
power plants and cars. Story
by Michael Peltier.
17 November 2007. U.N.
Report Describes Risks of Inaction
on Climate Change. By
ELISABETH ROSENTHAL, NY Times.
Excerpt: VALENCIA, Spain, Nov.
16 - In its final and most powerful
report, a United Nations panel of
scientists meeting here describes
the mounting risks of climate change
in language that is both more specific
and forceful than its previous assessments,
according to scientists here. ...the
United Nations Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change for the first
time specifically points out important
risks if governments fail to respond:
melting ice sheets that could lead
to a rapid rise in sea levels and
the extinction of large numbers of
species brought about by even moderate
amounts of warming, on the order
of 1 to 3 degrees.
..."This document goes further
than any of the previous efforts," said
Hans Verolme, director of the World
Wildlife Fund's Global Climate Change
Program. "The pressure has been
palpable - people know they are delivering
a document that will be cited for
years to come and will define policy."
The previous three sections, released
between February and April, focused
on one issue at a time: the first
on science, the second on how the
world could adapt to warming and
the third about how countries could "mitigate," or
reduce the greenhouse gases produced.
This fourth and final assessment
- the so-called synthesis report
- seeks to combine lessons from all
three. ...a powerful guide to what
the scientists consider of utmost
importance at the end of a five-year
process, offering concrete guidelines
for policy makers.
"You look to a synthesis report
to provide clarity, to clarify what
was obscure in previous reports," said
Michael Oppenheimer, a climate scientist
at Princeton University. "Now,
how can we take these findings and
formulate a policy response that's
quick enough and big enough?"
While drafts of the panel's reports
are written by panels of scientists,
the language is reviewed and often
altered by delegates from 130 governments
who meet before their final approval
and release. Those negotiations took
place here this week, and were often
contentious, with the United States,
China and India raising many objections,
said scientists who spoke on condition
of anonymity because they are not
allowed to publicly refer to any
countries by name.
...While the United States, Saudi
Arabia and China tried to change
the text in order to play down the
consequences of global warming, developing
nations - which will bear the initial
brunt of climate change - were much
more forceful than at previous meetings
in opposing these efforts, one scientist
who was in the negotiating room said....
14 November 2007. Governors
Join in Creating Regional Pacts
on Climate Change. By JOHN
M. BRODER, NY Times. Excerpt:
WASHINGTON, Nov. 14 - Frustrated
with the slow progress of legislation
in Washington on energy and global
warming, the nation's governors
have created regional agreements
to cap greenhouse gases and are
engaged in a concerted lobbying
effort to prod Congress to act.
Beginning Monday, three Western
governors will appear in a nationwide
television advertising campaign
sponsored by an environmental group
trying to generate public and political
support for climate change legislation
now before the Senate. The 30-second
ad features Arnold Schwarzenegger,
Republican of California; Jon Huntsman
Jr., Republican of Utah; and Brian
Schweitzer, Democrat of Montana,
standing in casual clothes in scenic
spots talking about the threat
posed by greenhouse gas emissions.
The nation's governors are acting,
but Congress is not, they say. "Now
it's their turn," Mr. Schwarzenegger
says.
Separately, in Milwaukee on Wednesday,
nine Midwestern governors and the
premier of Manitoba signed an agreement
to reduce carbon emissions and set
up a trading system to meet the reduction
targets. The Midwestern accord is
modeled on similar regional carbon-reduction
and energy-saving arrangements among
Northeastern, Southwestern and West
Coast states.
The advertising campaign is underwritten
by Environmental Defense, an advocacy
group that is pressing for quick
action on a climate change proposal
sponsored by Senators Joseph I. Lieberman,
an independent from Connecticut,
and John W. Warner, Republican of
Virginia.
The Lieberman-Warner legislation
would cap carbon emissions at 15
percent below 2005 levels by 2020
and set up a system for polluting
industries to trade emissions credits
to meet the goals. Like other such
bills before Congress, it would provide
incentives for research on capturing
and storing carbon dioxide from power
plants and subsidies to help the
poor handle the higher costs of electricity
in a carbon-constrained economy....
12 November 2007. UN
official warns of ignoring warming.
By ARTHUR MAX, Associated Press
Writer Excerpt:
VALENCIA, Spain - The U.N.'s top
climate official warned policymakers
and scientists trying to hammer out
a landmark report on climate change
that ignoring the urgency of global
warming would be "criminally
irresponsible.
Yvo de Boer's comments came at the
opening of a weeklong conference
that will complete a concise guide
on the state of global warming and
what can be done to stop the Earth
from overheating. It is the fourth
and last report issued this year
by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, co-winner of this
year's Nobel Peace prize.
...Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of
the Nobel Prize-winning panel, said
scientists were determined to "adhere
to standards of quality" in
the report. It was indirect barb
at the government representatives,
who have been accused by environmentalists
of watering down and excluding vital
information from the summaries of
earlier reports to fit their domestic
agendas.
...The report will provide the factual
underpinning for a crucial meeting
next month in Bali, Indonesia.
That conference will begin exploring
a new global strategy to curb greenhouse
gas emissions after the 2012 expiration
of the first phase of the Kyoto Protocol,
the landmark agreement that assigned
binding reduction targets to 36 countries....
On the Net:
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change: http://www.ipcc.ch
13 October 2007. Gore
Shares Peace Prize for Climate
Change Work. NY Times.
By WALTER GIBBS and SARAH LYALL.
Excerpt:
OSLO, Oct. 12 - Former Vice President
Al Gore, who emerged from his loss
in the muddled 2000 presidential
election to devote himself to his
passion as an environmental crusader,
was awarded the 2007 Nobel Peace
Prize on Friday, sharing it with
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, a United Nations network
of scientists . The Norwegian Nobel
Committee praised both "for
their efforts to build up and disseminate
greater knowledge about man-made
climate change." The prize is
a vindication for Mr. Gore, whose
cautionary film about the consequences
of climate change, "An Inconvenient
Truth," won the 2007 Academy
Award for best documentary, even
as conservatives in the United States
denounced it as alarmist and exaggerated.
...The award was also a validation
for the United Nations panel, which
in its early days was vilified by
those who disputed the scientific
case for a human role in climate
change. In New Delhi, the Indian
climatologist who heads the panel,
Rajendra K. Pachauri, said that science
had won out over skepticism....
25 September 2007. 'Arnie,
' 'Al' Push Climate Action.
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. UNITED
NATIONS (AP) Excerpt:
''Arnie'' and ''Al,'' Republican
and Democrat, shared the world spotlight
to press for climate action.....President
Bush, who did take part later in
a small, private U.N. dinner with
key players on climate, rejects
the idea of international treaty
obligations to reduce emissions
of carbon dioxide and other ''greenhouse
gases'' blamed for global warming
-- an idea central to U.N. climate
negotiations.
The Republican Schwarzenegger, on
the other hand, has taken the lead
on emissions caps at the state level,
signing legislation mandating such
reductions in California.
.....''The need to act is now,''
Democrat Gore told delegates to the
one-day summit, which drew more than
80 world leaders. ''We need a mandate
at Bali.''
He was referring the annual U.N.
climate treaty conference, scheduled
for December in Bali, Indonesia,
where the Europeans and others hope
to initiate talks for an emissions-reduction
agreement to succeed the Kyoto Protocol
in 2012.
The 175-nation Kyoto pact, which
the U.S. rejects, requires 36 industrial
nations to reduce the heat-trapping
gases emitted by power plants and
other industrial, agricultural and
transportation sources...
....Bush objects that Kyoto-style
mandates would damage the U.S. economy
and says they should be imposed on
fast-growing poorer countries such
as China and India in addition to
developed nations...
On Thursday and Friday, Bush will
host his own Washington climate meeting,
limited to 16 ''major emitter'' countries,
including China and India, the first
in a series of U.S.-led gatherings
expected to focus on those themes.
''The Washington meeting is a distraction,''
Hans Verolme, climate campaigner
for the Worldwide Fund for Nature,
told reporters here. The Bush administration
needs ''to show they are serious
and implement domestic legislation
to reduce emissions,'' he said.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice,
speaking at the summit, put the Washington
meetings in a different light, describing
them as designed ''to support and
help advance the ongoing U.N. discussion....''
10 September 2007. Climate
Change hits US Federal Land, Water-Report.
WASHINGTON. Excerpt: More
beetles and fewer spruce trees in
Alaska, whiter coral and fewer scuba-divers
in Florida and more wildfires in
Arizona already show the impact of
climate change on US lands and waters,
a congressional watchdog agency reported
on Thursday.
..."Undertaking activities that
address the effects of climate change
is currently not a priority" for
the five US agencies that manage
this territory, the report by the
nonpartisan investigative arm of
Congress said.
These agencies are the Bureau of
Land Management, Forest Service,
Fish and Wildlife Service, National
Park Service and the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration.
The Interior Department, which includes
three of the five agencies, ordered
them in 2001 to analyze potential
climate change effects on US-managed
lands, but has not yet provided direction
to managers on how to plan for climate
change, the report said.
Resource managers at the other two
agencies echoed that sentiment, according
to the report.
...The authors based their conclusions
on discussions with scientists, economists
and federal resource managers, and
field studies of four federal areas
that represent distinct ecosystems.
These are: the Florida Keys National
Marine Sanctuary, representing coasts
and oceans; the Chugach National
Forest in Alaska, representing forests;
Glacier National Park in Montana,
representing fresh waters; and the
Bureau of Land Management's Arizona
field office, representing grasslands
and shrublands.
In the Florida Keys, they found rising
sea levels that can be attributed
to climate change have already affected
low-lying areas, and saltwater intrusion
on land has cut the fresh water and
habitat that support native plants
and animals.
... global warming may hamper fishing
and tourism in this ecosystem, ....
Warmer temperatures and reduced precipitation
associated with climate change in
Alaska's Chugach National Forest
have contributed to outbreaks of
insects, such as the spruce bark
beetles which have killed some kinds
of spruce trees over the forest's
400,000 acres (161,900 hectares),
the report said.
In Montana, the glaciers that give
Glacier National Park its name are
dwindling, down from 150 in 1950
to 26 now, according to the report.
Arizona's Mojave Desert is suffering
more virulent wildfires due at least
in part to climate change, the report
said, because drought has damaged
native plants and allowed invasive
grasses to take over, making it easier
for fires to start and harder to
extinguish them.
28 August 2007. Greenland's
Ice Island Alarm. By Kendall
Haven
Excerpt: In early spring, with the
summer melt still weeks away, researchers
flock like migrating birds to the
Greenland Ice Sheet. ...Waleed Abdalati,
head of NASA Goddard Space Flight
Center's Cryospheric Sciences Branch,
was one of those migrating researchers.
His boots were on the ice most years
from 1993 through 2004....
Scientists and policy makers
asked: Is Greenland melting? If so,
how fast, and how high will sea level
rise as a result? "Through the
1990s, the only answer scientists
could give was 'We don't know,'" Abdalati
recalls.
What would large-scale ice loss on
Greenland mean to the rest of the
world? "Things we've come to
count on could change," he explains.
Coastlines will recede as sea level
rises and ocean water edges inland,
threatening coastal cities. The changing
ice could impact ocean and atmospheric
circulation patterns and the global
climate to which life today has adapted.
What will be the nature and impact
of these changes? Abdalati's answer: "While
the future impacts of the changing
ice cover are uncertain, the potential
effects are scary enough so that
we better figure it out."
...Bill Krabill, a geoscientist at
NASA's Wallops Flight Facility, measured
an inland gain of up to 1 meter of
snow and up to three times average
snowfall in some areas of Southeast
Greenland between 2002 and 2003.
In 2005, Ola Johannessen, from the
University of Bergen's Nansen Environmental
and Remote Sensing Center, measured
a gain of 2.4 inches per year from
1992 to 2003 for elevations above
1,500 meters, with a net ice loss
below that elevation. But even if
the models were right, which trend-ice
gain in the interior, or melting
at the margin-would prove greater,
and by how much?
...Isabella Velicogna, a scientist
with a joint appointment at NASA's
Jet Propulsion Lab and the University
of Colorado... explains... "We
had to make new model assumptions.
...Her ... results showed a net mass
loss for the ice sheet of 248 gigatons
per year-enough to raise sea level
about half a millimeter each year.
(A gigaton is one billion metric
tons, the mass of a cube of water
that is 1 kilometer wide, tall, and
deep.) Although other NASA researchers
published similar findings shortly
after Velicogna, these GRACE results
showed a significantly larger loss-four
to five times more ice loss-than
most estimates that scientists had
published before hers, based on different
data from the 1990s through 2003....
See also:
NASA CELEBRATES
A DECADE OBSERVING CLIMATE IMPACTS
ON HEALTH OF WORLD'S OCEANS
19 September 2007
NASA RESEARCHERS FIND SNOWMELT IN
ANTARCTICA CREEPING INLAND
20 September 2007
GREENLAND SNOW MELTING HIT RECORD
HIGH IN HIGH PLACES
25 September 2007.
28 August 2007. GREENHOUSE
GASES LIKELY DROVE NEAR-RECORD
U.S. WARMTH IN 2006. Excerpt:
Greenhouse
gases likely accounted
for more than half of the widespread
warmth across the continental United
States last year, according to
a new study by four scientists
at NOAAâs
Earth System Research Lab in Boulder,
Colo. Last yearâs average temperature
was the second highest since record-keeping
began in 1895. The team found that
it was very unlikely that the 2006 El
Nino played any role, though
other natural factors likely contributed
to the unusual warmth. ...The NOAA
team also found that the probability
of U.S. temperatures breaking a record
in 2006 had increased 15-fold compared
to pre-industrial times because of
greenhouse gas increases in Earth's
atmosphere. Preliminary data available
last January led NOAA to place 2006
as the warmest year on record. In
May, NOAA changed the 2006 ranking
to second warmest after updated statistics
showed the year was 0.08 degree F
cooler than 1998.
6 August 2007. Catching
Up With Climate. Contact: Paul
Preuss, science@berkeley lab. From
the evidence of tree rings, the
last 50 years were the warmest
half-century in 1,300 years. Eleven
of the past 12 years are the hottest
on record since reliable record-keeping
began in 1850; since 1870, sea level
has risen some eight inches worldwide,
and the rate is accelerating; since
1900, glaciers have shrunk 80 percent,
and polar ice is melting fast; concentrations
of carbon dioxide are 35 percent
higher than preindustrial levels.
Meanwhile, humans keep pouring CO2
into the air, ratcheting temperatures
toward the tipping point. To buy
time, we need the best mix of conservation,
alternative energy sources, new fuels,
carbon sequestration, and other strategies.
Decisions we make now, or fail to
make, will lead at best to discomfort
- or to disaster for many. The shape
of things to come may crucially depend
on better climate models, based on
better climate science. ..."Current
climate models are a blunt tool.
We want to sharpen that tool," says
Bill Collins of Berkeley Lab's Earth
Sciences Division (ESD). "Climate
models of the future will have to
be able to zoom in on the regional
scale, make accurate predictions
for the near term, and account for
what humans actually do."....
11 July 2007. Warming
Report Warns of Increased Flooding.
By ANTHONY DePALMA. NY Times. Excerpt:
One-hundred-year floods could come
as often as once every 10 years
by the end of this century, Long
Island lobsters could disappear
and New York apples could be just
a memory if nothing is done to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions,
according to a new report on
the impact of global
warming by the Union
of Concerned Scientists. The
report, which covers New York, New
Jersey along with the entire Northeast,
was released at a news conference
at the New
York Botanical Garden this morning,
in the wake of an intense heat wave
of the kind that scientists warned
could come far more frequently if
business continues as usual. ...New
York City might have to swelter through
a full month with temperatures over
100 degrees. The prolonged heat could
dry up the Catskill Mountain waters
that supply the city, and air quality
could decline, worsening conditions
for people with asthma and allergies.
Some changes, like earlier springs,
longer summers and less snowy winters
are already being seen.... But scientists
said things would become far worse,
and much more costly, ... sea levels
could rise, inundating coastal areas
on southern Long Island and pushing
water over parts of lower Manhattan,
flooding the financial district and
pouring water into the subways, making
them inoperable. The impact on New
York State's $3.5 billion a year
agricultural industry could be devastating,
said David Wolfe, professor of plant
ecology in the Department
of Horticulture at Cornell
University.....
Professor McCarthy said the two alternative
futures laid out in the study...
the regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative,
in which all the Northeastern states
agreed to reduce power plant emissions
and establish a carbon trading program,
and the recently approved New Jersey
legislation to reduce all greenhouse
gas emissions in the state to 20
percent of current levels by mid-century.
...The full report can be found at
the Union
of Concerned Scientists' Web site.
19 June 2007. Maine
Law Caps Carbon Dioxide Emissions.
By KATIE ZEZIMA. Excerpt:
BOSTON, June 18 — Gov. John
Baldacci of Maine signed a bill
on Monday establishing how the
state will reduce pollution and
cap power plant emissions in a
regional effort to reduce carbon
dioxide output. Maine is one of
10 Eastern states in the Regional
Greenhouse Gas Initiative, or R.G.G.I.
(pronounced “Reggie”),
which is intended to lower carbon
dioxide output from power plants.
... Under the regional initiative,
other states, including Maryland,
can put into effect their rules
through their environmental protection
departments rather than their legislatures.
... Maine accounts for 3 percent
of United States carbon emissions.
It will cap its emissions at 5.9
million tons in 2009, and reduce
them 10 percent by 2019. Under
the new law, six power plants will
start paying allowances to the
state in 2009 that let them emit
carbon dioxide. One allowance will
pay for one ton of carbon dioxide
emitted, with the price of each
allowance dictated by a market
in which companies can buy and
sell the allowances. ...
30 May 2007. Research
Finds that Earth's Climate is Approaching
'Tipping Point'. Press Release,
NASA. Excerpt: "NASA and
Columbia University Earth Institute
research finds that human-made greenhouse
gases have brought the Earth's climate
close to critical tipping points,
with potentially dangerous consequences
for the planet. From a combination
of climate models, satellite data,
and paleoclimate records the scientists
conclude that the West Antarctic
ice sheet, Arctic ice cover, and
regions providing fresh water sources
and species habitat are under threat
from continued global warming. The
research appears in the current issue
of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics...
This study finds that global warming
of 0.6¼C in the past 30 years
has been driven mainly by increasing
greenhouse gases, and only moderate
additional climate forcing is likely
to set in motion disintegration of
the West Antarctic ice sheet and
Arctic sea ice. Amplifying feedbacks
include increased absorption of sunlight
as melting exposes darker surfaces
and speedup of iceberg discharge
as the warming ocean melts ice shelves
that otherwise inhibit ice flow...
Lead author James Hansen, NASA Goddard
Institute for Space Studies, New
York, concludes: 'If global emissions
of carbon dioxide continue to rise
at the rate of the past decade, this
research shows that there will be
disastrous effects, including increasingly
rapid sea level rise, increased frequency
of droughts and floods, and increased
stress on wildlife and plants due
to rapidly shifting climate zones...
While the researchers say it is still
possible to achieve [an] alternative
scenario, they note that significant
actions will be required to do so.
Emissions must begin to slow soon...
With another decade of business-as-usual
it becomes impractical to achieve
the alternative scenario because
of the energy infrastructure that
would be in place.'"
18 May 2007. SOUTHERN
OCEAN CARBON SINK WEAKENED.
NASA Earth Observatory -- Excerpt:
In research published today in
Science, an international research
team - including CSIRO's Dr. Ray
Langenfelds - concludes that the
Southern Ocean carbon dioxide sink
has weakened over the past 25 years
and will be less efficient in the
future. Such weakening of one of
the Earth's major carbon dioxide
sinks will lead to higher levels
of atmospheric carbon dioxide in
the long-term. Dr. Paul Fraser,
... leads research into atmospheric
greenhouse gases at CSIRO Marine
and Atmospheric Research.... "The
researchers found that the Southern
Ocean is becoming less efficient
at absorbing carbon dioxide due to
an increase in wind strength over
the Ocean, resulting from human-induced
climate change," Dr. Fraser
says. "The increase in wind
strength is due to a combination
of higher levels of greenhouse gases
in the atmosphere and long-term ozone
depletion in the stratosphere, which
previous CSIRO research has shown
intensifies storms over the Southern
Ocean." The increased winds
influence the processes of mixing
and upwelling in the ocean, which
in turn cause an increased release
of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere,
reducing the net absorption of carbon
dioxide into the ocean....
15 May 2007. NASA
FINDS VAST REGIONS OF WEST ANTARCTICA
MELTED IN RECENT PAST. NASA
Earth Observatory. Excerpt:
A team of NASA and university scientists
has found clear evidence that extensive
areas of snow melted in west Antarctica
in January 2005 in response to warm
temperatures. This was the first
widespread Antarctic melting ever
detected with NASA's QuikScat satellite
and the most significant melt observed
using satellites during the past
three decades. Combined, the affected
regions encompassed an area as big
as California. Son Nghiem of NASA's
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena,
Calif., and Konrad Steffen, director
of the Cooperative Institute for
Research in Environmental Sciences
at the University of Colorado, Boulder,
led the team. Using data from QuikScat,
they measured snowfall accumulation
and melt in Antarctica and Greenland
from July 1999 through July 2005.
...Evidence of melting was found
up to 900 kilometers (560 miles)
inland from the open ocean, ...and
higher than 2,000 meters (6,600 feet)
above sea level. Maximum air temperatures
at the time of the melting were unusually
high, reaching more than five degrees
Celsius (41 degrees Fahrenheit) in
one of the affected areas. They remained
above melting for approximately a
week. "Antarctica has shown
little to no warming in the recent
past ... but now large regions are
showing the first signs of the impacts
of warming as interpreted by this
satellite analysis," said Steffen.
...Changes in the ice mass of Antarctica,
Earth's largest freshwater reservoir,
are important to understanding global
sea level rise. Large amounts of
Antarctic freshwater flowing into
the ocean also could affect ocean
salinity, currents and global climate....
9 May 2007. Clean
Power That Reaps a Whirlwind.
By KEITH BRADSHER, The New York
Times. Excerpt:
HOUXINQIU, China - The wind turbines
rising 180 feet above this dusty
village at the hilly edge of Inner
Mongolia could be an environmentalist's
dream... are also part of a growing
dispute over a United Nations program
that is the centerpiece of international
efforts to help developing countries
combat global warming. ...the Clean
Development Mechanism, ...raising
billions of dollars from rich countries
and transferring them to poor countries
to curb the emission of global warming
gases. ...China is expected to pass
the United States this year or next
to become the world's largest emitter
of global warming gases. ...the Clean
Development Mechanism ...has grown
at an extraordinary pace, to $4.8
billion in transfer payments to developing
countries last year from less than
$100 million in 2002. The Clean Development
Mechanism ...helps advanced industrial
nations stay within their Kyoto
Protocol limits for emitting climate-changing
gases like carbon dioxide. For
each ton of global warming gases
that a developing country can prove
it has eliminated, the secretariat
of the Clean Development Mechanism...
awards it a credit. Developing
countries sold credits last year...
for an average price of $10.70
each. ...China captured $3 billion
of the $4.8 billion.... African
countries... totaled less than
$150 million last year.... Even
when very poor countries are able
to organize development projects,
they may lack expertise and must
sometimes pay out as much as half
the credits in the form of fees for
international consultants and credit
brokers. ...before manufacturers
can obtain the subsidies, their national
governments need to set up a legal
framework for handling the money,
which some of the poorest countries
have not yet been able to do....The
wind turbine project here in Houxinqiu
...generates nearly 24 megawatts
of electricity that would otherwise
come from coal. China is already
building enough coal-fired power
plants each year to light all of
Britain. ...Li Guohai, a local peasant
...explained how he had received
free electricity since the wind turbines
were erected four years ago. He has
saved enough money that he bought
an all-steel plow for his mules to
pull; the new plow now frees his
son to finish junior high school
and perhaps go to high school, Mr.
Li said. The project is narrowly
profitable even without Clean Development
Mechanism payments, Mr. Tao, the
general manager, said. But the payments
made the project more attractive
and made it easier to raise money
for it.
...the wind farm saves the equivalent
of 35,119 tons of carbon dioxide
emissions a year. At $8 a credit,
that is worth $281,000....
6 May 2007. When
Carbon Is Currency.
By HANNAH FAIRFIELD. NY Times. Excerpt:
AMID steadily increasing carbon emissions,
and a federal government hesitant
to take the lead on climate legislation,
10 states have joined to create the
first mandatory carbon cap-and-trade
program in the United States. They
aim to reduce emissions from power
plants by 10 percent in 10 years.
Leaders of state environmental and
energy regulatory agencies hammered
out the detailed model for the program,
the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative,
over the course of three years. The
program sets a cap on the total amount
of carbon that the 10 states - as
a whole - can emit. Starting in 2009,
each state will receive a set amount
of carbon credits for its power plants,
and each plant must have enough allowances
to cover its total emissions at the
end of three-year compliance periods.
In 2003, George E. Pataki, then New
York's governor, invited governors
of 10 other states from Maine to
Maryland to discuss a program to
cut power plant emissions. All but
one of the states joined the program;
Pennsylvania has observer status.
Officials have closely watched the
European Union, which started its
carbon trading market in 2005. ...
In Europe, power companies received
these credits directly and could
buy or sell from one another as needed.
But most companies passed the cost
of the credits on to consumers even
though they received them free -
giving the companies windfall profits.
Power companies in Britain alone
made about $1 billion from free credits
in 2005, according to a study by
the British government....
1 May 2007. Arctic
Sea Ice Melting Faster, a Study
Finds. By ANDREW
C. REVKIN, NY Times. Excerpt:
Climate scientists may have significantly
underestimated the power of global
warming from human-generated heat-trapping
gases to shrink the cap of sea ice
floating on the Arctic Ocean, according
to a new study of polar trends. The
study, published online today in
Geophysical Research Letters, concluded
that an open-water Arctic in summers
could be more likely in this century
than had been estimated in the latest
international review of climate research
released in February by the United
Nations Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change. "There are huge
changes going on," said Julienne
Stroeve, a lead author of the new
study and a researcher at the National
Snow and Ice Datajn Center in Boulder,
Colo. "Just
with warm waters entering the Arctic,
combined with warming air temperatures,
this is wreaking havoc on the sea
ice, really." The intergovernmental
panel concluded that if emissions
of heat-trapping gases like carbon
dioxide were not significantly reduced,
the region could end up bereft of
floating ice in summers sometime
between 2050 and the early decades
of the next century....
May 2007. EU
hammers out pact to cut greenhouse
gas emissions. Karen
H. Kaplan - Physics Today May 2007,
page 26. (Full
article can only be viewed by members
of American Geophysical Union with
password) Excerpt:
European leaders applauded successful
efforts by German chancellor Angela
Merkel, current head of the European
Union and a physicist, to guide the
27-member bloc in March to an agreement
that is widely considered both a
critical and impressive step in the
battle against climate change....Under
the pact, achieved after months of
negotiations, the EU will cut greenhouse
gas emissions by one-fifth from 1990
levels and produce one-fifth of its
energy from renewable sources by
2020. As part of the plan, the EU
also set a 10% minimum target on
the use of biofuels for transport
by 2020. The agreement aims to address
climate change after the commitments
for industrialized nations contained
in the 1997 Kyoto Protocol expire
in 2012. EU member states are among
140 governments worldwide that participate
in Kyoto, which the US refused to
ratify (see PHYSICS TODAY, January
2002, page 26)...."We can say
to the rest of the world, 'Europe
is taking the lead. You should join
us in fighting climate change,' " Barroso
said....In January 2005, the EU adopted
the Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading
Scheme, under which each member state
has a national allocation plan that
specifies caps on carbon emissions
for individual power plants and other
emissions sources. Each facility
gets a certain emissions allowance
for a particular period. To comply
with the cap, facilities can either
cut their emissions or buy allowances
from other facilities....In BP's
hydrogen program, coal is burned
to produce CO2 and hydrogen; the
CO2 is separated out and buried underground
while the hydrogen is burned to generate
power. "Needless
to say, it's more expensive than
the traditional way, just burning
the coal and venting the CO2 to the
atmosphere," Koonin acknowledged. "But
we believe we can reduce costs."
25 April 2007. NASA's
AIM (Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere)
spacecraft began its two-year mission. The
AIM mission is the first dedicated
to exploring mysterious ice clouds
that dot the edge of space in Earth's
polar regions. These clouds have
grown brighter and more prevalent
in recent years and some scientists
suggest that changes in these clouds
may be the result of climate change.
With AIM, Hampton University in
Virginia becomes the first Historically
Black College and University to
lead a NASA satellite mission.
Dr. James M. Russell, III, professor
and co-director of Hampton University's
Center for Atmospheric Sciences,
is AIMs principal investigator.
24 April 2007. Satellites
Offer Sunny Outlook on Understanding
Polar Climate, With Help of Cloudy
Skies. NASA Goddard
News. Excerpt:
Far beyond signaling the day's weather,
clouds play a key role in regulating
and understanding climate. A team
of researchers recently completed
a project to confirm what NASA satellites
are telling us about how changes
in clouds can affect climate in the
coldest regions on Earth. ... In
2006, NASA simultaneously launched
a pair of satellites, CloudSat and
the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared
Pathfinder Satellite Observation
(CALIPSO), which together use state-of-the-art
instruments as they orbit the globe
to reveal detailed information about
clouds and their effect on climate.
... "The polar regions are very
sensitive indicators of climate change," said
Deborah Vane, project manager and
deputy principal investigator for
the CloudSat mission at NASA's Jet
Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena,
Calif. "It's been well reported
now that the polar ice caps are undergoing
net melting. There's a complicated
interaction between clouds and climate
in polar regions that can contribute
to temperature changes, and, in turn,
speed the rate at which ice melts." ...CloudSat
peers into clouds from hundreds of
miles above to allow researchers
a sneak peek into just how cloud
droplets change to become rain or
snow. CALIPSO uses laser technology
called lidar to gather data globally
that researchers will use to analyze
how clouds and aerosols affect the
atmosphere....
24 April, 2007. First
Mission to Explore Those Wisps
in the Night Sky. By KENNETH
CHANG. NY TIMES. Excerpt:…NASA
is launching a small satellite
to take a closer look at these
clouds at the edge of outer space
and to try to understand why, in
recent years, they are appearing
more often over more parts of the
world. They are also becoming brighter.
The clouds are called noctilucent
or "night shining," because
from the ground they can be seen
only at night as they float about
50 miles above the surface, illuminated
by light from a Sun that has already
set below the horizon. The
clouds form in the polar regions
from mid-May to mid-August in the
Northern Hemisphere, mid-November
to mid-February in the Southern
Hemisphere…A British sky
watcher named Thomas William Backhouse
was perhaps the first to notice
the odd blue wisps in 1885, and
many scientists thought that the
phenomenon was an atmospheric effect
caused by ash thrown up by the
gigantic volcanic eruption of Krakatoa
in Indonesia two years earlier.
Although the ash settled out of
the air, the noctilucent clouds
persisted and spread …..Since
1980, when regular space-based
observations of noctilucent clouds
began, their number has increased
about 28 percent per decade, and
they are reflecting more light,
because the ice crystals are bigger….."The
most plausible and leading theory
is CO2 buildup, which causes global
warming," Dr. Russell said.
Increasing temperatures near the
surface actually cause the upper
part of the atmosphere to cool,
and cooler temperatures could spur
the formation of more clouds. "If
that's true and we are changing
the atmosphere in a remote location
like this, that means we're changing
the entire atmosphere," he
said…..
23 April 2007. Climate
Change Adds Twist to Debate Over Dams.
By William Yardley. NY TIMES. KLAMATH
FALLS, Ore., April 19 - Excerpt:
The power company that owns four
hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River
says the dams provide a crucial source
of so-called clean energy at a time
when carbon emissions have become one
of the world's foremost environmental
concerns. The clean-energy argument
has entered a debate over dams. But
the American Indians, fishermen and
environmentalists who want the dams
removed point to
what has happened since the first one
was built nearly 90 years ago: endangered
salmon have been blocked from migrating,
Indian livelihoods have been threatened,
and, more recently, the commercial
fishing industry off the Oregon and
California coasts has been devastated.. …The
Klamath dams provide enough power to
serve about 70,000 homes, a small fraction
of PacifiCorp's 1.6 million customers,
which span six Western states. But
the company says only coal or natural
gas are likely to be reliable enough
to replace the river, which hits hydroelectric
turbines four times on its way to the
sea from east of the snow-capped Cascade
Range. Those who support removing the
dams largely dismiss the clean-energy
argument, saying the benefits outweigh
losing a relatively small source of
hydropower. They note that PacifiCorp's
increased interest in the environment
comes as recent rulings by judges and
federal fisheries agencies have given
new momentum for removal. The company's
federal license to run the dams expired
last year, and the government has said
PacifiCorp must build fish ladders
over the four dams to get a new license,
a proposition that could cost $300
million and reduce the power the dams
generate, potentially making removal
a less costly choice……The
Klamath runs more than 250 miles from
southwest Oregon to the California
coast, connecting two states where
power and water supply have long been
contentious issues……The
Northwest, where more than 80 percent
of the power generated comes from hydroelectricity,
has long had some of the lowest electricity
rates in the nation. It has also been
the setting for epic environmental
fights that reflect the tension across
the region's topographic and demographic
divides……
19 April 2007. SCIENTISTS
TRACK IMPACT OF ASIAN DUST AND
POLLUTION ON CLOUDS, CLIMATE CHANGE. NASA Earth
Observatory. Excerpt: Scientists
using one of the nation's newest
and most capable research aircraft
are launching a far-reaching field
project this month to study plumes
of airborne dust and pollutants that
originate in Asia and journey to
North America ...Known as PACDEX
(Pacific Dust Experiment), the project
will be led by scientists at the
National Center for Atmospheric Research
(NCAR) and the Scripps Institution
of Oceanography. ...The first mission
will be launched in late April, depending
on weather patterns in Asia. It will
continue for two months.
To study the changes in the plumes
as they move through the atmosphere
from Japan to the western United
States, the PACDEX team will deploy
the NSF Gulfstream-V aircraft....
...explains NCAR scientist Jeff Stith,
a principal investigator on the project... "We
want to determine how the various
particles of dust and pollutants
influence clouds and climate, and
how far downwind those effects occur." ...As
Asia's economies boom, scientists
are increasingly turning their attention
to the plumes, which pack a combination
of industrial emissions (such as
soot, smog, and trace metals) and
dust from storms in regions such
as Central Asia's Gobi Desert. The
plumes can alter global temperatures
by interacting with large-scale,
mid-latitude cloud systems over the
Pacific that reflect enormous amounts
of sunlight and help regulate global
climate....
7 April 2007. Late
Changes Made Report More Dire,
and Less. By ANDREW
C. REVKIN. NY Times. Excerpt:
Since it was created in 1988, the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change has been
criticized from all sides at one
time or another. ...The summaries
of the panel's voluminous reports
are fought over with particular vigor,
especially at the point when they
must pass muster with governments
before they are officially approved.
In final work among authors and a
late-night showdown between authors
and government officials, the wording
of the latest report was adjusted
in some cases to play up uncertainty
and in others to spell out the downside
of climate-related trends. In at
least one section, on climate impacts
in Europe, those with a more dire
view clearly had their way. "In
Southern Europe, climate change is
projected to worsen conditions (high
temperatures and drought) in a region
already vulnerable to climate variability,
and to reduce water availability, hydropower
potential, summer tourism, and in general,
crop productivity. It is also projected
to increase health risks due to heat
waves and the frequency of wildfires." "In
Central and Eastern Europe, summer
precipitation is projected to decrease,
causing higher water stress." "Health
risks due to heat waves are projected
to increase. Forest productivity is
expected to decline and the frequency
of peatland fires to increase." In
Northern Europe, climate change is
initially projected to bring mixed
effects, including some benefits such
as reduced demand for heating, increased
crop yields and increased forest growth.
However, as climate change continues,
its negative impacts (including more
frequent winter floods, endangered
ecosystems and increasing ground instability)
are likely to outweigh its benefits." "Many
millions more people are projected
to be flooded every year due to sea-level
rise by the 2080s. Those densely populated
and low-lying areas where adaptive
capacity is relatively low, and which
already face other challenges such
as tropical storms or local coastal
subsidence, are especially at risk."
7 April 2007. Scientists
Detail Climate Changes, Poles to
Tropics. By JAMES
KANTER and ANDREW C. REVKIN. NY Times.
Excerpt:
BRUSSELS, April 6 - In its most
detailed portrait of the effects
of climate change driven by human
activities, the panel predicted widening
droughts in southern Europe and the
Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa,
the American Southwest and Mexico,
and flooding that could imperil low-lying
islands and the crowded river deltas
of southern Asia. It stressed that
many of the regions facing the greatest
risks were among the world's poorest.
And it said that while limits on
smokestack and tailpipe emissions
could lower the long-term risks,
vulnerable regions must adjust
promptly to shifting weather patterns,
climatic and coastal hazards, and
rising seas.
Without such adaptations, it said,
a rise of 3 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit
over the next century could lead
to the inundation of coasts and islands
inhabited by hundreds of millions
of people. But if steady investments
are made in seawalls and other coastal
protections, vulnerability could
be sharply reduced. The group, the
United Nations' Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, also noted
that the climate shifts would benefit
some regions - leading to more rainfall
and longer growing seasons in high
latitudes, open Arctic seaways and
fewer deaths from the cold. ...Under
pressure from nations including Russia,
China and Saudi Arabia, the authors
said, sections on coral damage and
tropical storms were softened in
the summary. ....
5 April 2007. U.N.
Draft Cites Humans in Recent Climate
Shifts By ANDREW C. REVKIN.
NY Times. Excerpt:
The latest United Nations assessment
of the role of humans in global
warming has found with "high
confidence" that
greenhouse gas emissions are at least
partly responsible for a host of
changes already under way, including
longer growing seasons and shrinking
glaciers. ...Some of the changes
could be beneficial, but most will
prove harmful in the long run, the
report says. It finds that global
warming caused by humans has almost
certainly contributed to recent shifts
in ecosystems, weather patterns,
oceans and icy regions, and that
it will have large and lasting effects
on human affairs and on the planet's
web of life in this century. The
draft report predicts a variety of
health effects as well, with "increased
deaths, disease and injury due to
heat waves, floods, storms, fires
and droughts," but also "some
benefits to health such as fewer
deaths from cold." Also in the
plus column, higher concentrations
of carbon dioxide... are contributing
to a greener world.... "Based
on satellite observations since the
early 1980s, ...there has been a
trend in many regions towards earlier
greening of vegetation in the spring
and increased net primary production
linked to longer growing seasons
and increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations," it
said. ...Water supplies fed by alpine
snows or ice sheets are already experiencing
changes and could be greatly disrupted....
Among other findings, the draft says: "Coasts
are very likely to be exposed to
increasing risks due to climate change
and sea-level rise, and the effect
will be exacerbated by increasing
human-induced pressures on coastal
areas." "It
is likely that corals will experience
a major decline due to increased
bleaching and mortality due to rising
seawater temperatures." Many
of the world's regions that are already
vulnerable to climate and coastal
hazards are likely to see the biggest
effects from additional changes driven
by the buildup of greenhouse gases. "Poor
communities can be especially vulnerable," it
says, "because they tend to
be concentrated in relatively high-risk
areas, have more limited coping capacities,
and can be more dependent on climate-sensitive
resources such as local water and
food supplies." ....
13 March 2007. Britain
Aims for CO2 - Limit Target Dates.
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. Excerpt:
LONDON (AP) -- Britain proposed
setting legally binding targets
for cutting carbon dioxide emissions,
saying Tuesday it wanted to lead
by example in the global campaign
against climate change. Environment
Secretary David Miliband said the
bill, which includes targets for
reducing emissions that must be
achieved by 2020 and 2050, was
''the first of its kind in any
country. The debate on climate
change has shifted from whether
we need to act to how much we need
to do by when, and the economic
implications of doing so,'' he
said....
9 March 2007. EU
Leaders Agree to Cut Greenhouse
Gases. By Paul
Ames, The Associated Press. Excerpt:
European Union leaders on Friday
endorsed binding targets to cut greenhouse
gases and ensure a fifth of the bloc's
energy comes from green power such
as wind turbines and solar panels.
The deal also noted the role nuclear
power could play in tackling greenhouse
gas emissions, an inclusion not welcomed
by all leaders. ...European Commission
President Jose Manuel Barroso called
the measures "the most ambitious
package ever agreed by any institution
on energy security and climate change."...European
leaders hope their commitment to
tackling climate change will encourage
other leading polluters like the
United States and China to agree
on deep emissions cuts.
...The deal contains a reference
to the role of nuclear power, a demand
of the French, Czechs, Slovaks and
others who argued it could play a
crucial part in helping Europe move
away from carbon fuels. ...Austria,
Ireland and Denmark did not want
the EU to sanction nuclear power,
and the German government is split
over whether to develop atomic energy. "Our
Austrian attitude toward sustainable
energy definitely does not include
nuclear energy," Foreign Minister
Ursula Plassnik told reporters. Friends
of the Earth said it was appalled
by the mention of nuclear power. "Nuclear
energy is too expensive," said
Jan Kowalzig, a campaigner with the
group. "Nations should invest
more cleverly in developing other
energy sources." He called the
20 percent target for renewables "too
low," but said the group was
pleased it was binding.
2 March 2007. UN
REPORT EXCLUSIVE - Climate Change
Impact More Extensive than Thought.
By Volker Mrasek, Spiegel Online. Excerpt:
Global climate change is happening
faster than previously believed
and its impact is worse than expected,
information from an as-yet unpublished
draft of the long-awaited second
part of a United Nations report
obtained by SPIEGEL ONLINE reveals.
No region of the planet will be spared
and some will be hit especially hard....The
second part of the [IPCC] report
is to be presented in April ....
The main conclusion of the report
is that climate change is already
having a profound effect on all the
continents and on many of the Earth's
ecosystems. The draft presents a
long list of evidence:
- Glacial
lakes are increasing in both
size and number, potentially
leading to deadly floods.
- Permafrost
in mountainous regions and at
high latitudes is warming increasing
the danger of land slides.
- As
the temperature of rivers and
lakes rises, their thermal stratification
and water quality is changing.
- River
currents, affected by melting
glaciers and ice, are speeding
up during the spring.
- Springtime
is starting earlier, causing
plants to bloom earlier and changing
the migrations of birds.
- Many
plants and animals are expanding
their habitats into mountainous
regions and higher latitudes that
are becoming milder.....
Many natural resources are likely
to fall victim to climate change
according to the IPCC draft report:
- Some
20 to 30 percent of all species
face a "high risk
of extinction" should
average global temperatures rise
another 1.5 to 2.5 degrees Celsius
from their 1990 levels. That could
happen by 2050, the report warns.
- Coral
reefs are "likely to
undergo strong declines."
- Salt
marshes and mangrove forests
could disappear as sea levels
rise.
- Tropical
rainforests will be replaced
by savanna in those regions where
groundwater decreases.
- Migratory
birds and mammals will suffer
as vegetation zones in the Artic
shift.
The IPCC expects the following
world regions to suffer the most
due to climate change:
- The
Arctic due to the greatest relative
warming
- Small
island states in the Pacific
as sea levels rise
- Africa
south of the Sahel zone due to
drought
- Densely
populated river deltas in Asia
amid flooding....
25 February 2007. LAKES
UNDER ANTARCTIC ICE LINKED TO SEA
LEVEL RISE - This
broadcast of Earth & Sky radio
show featured NASA scientist Bob
Bindschadler. The show is also available
to download as an audio Podcast.
18 February 2007. FROM
ICEHOUSE TO HOTHOUSE: MELTING ICE
AND RISING CARBON DIOXIDE CAUSED
CLIMATE SHIFT.
Three hundred million years ago,
Earth's climate shifted dramatically
from icehouse to hothouse, with
major environmental consequences.
15 February 2007. Study
Questions Prospects for Much Lower
Emissions.
By MATTHEW L. WALD, NY Times. Excerpt:
As Democratic leaders in Congress prepare
to put climate change legislation on
the agenda, some in the utility industry
are arguing that it will take decades
of investments and innovation to get
substantial reductions in their emissions
of greenhouse gases. Electric power
companies, which emit about one-third
of America's global warming gases,
could reduce their emissions to below
the levels of 1990, but that would
take about 20 years, no matter how
much the utilities spend, according
to a new industry study. The report,
prepared by the Electric Power Research
Institute, a nonprofit consortium,
is portrayed as highly optimistic by
its authors, who will present the findings
on Thursday at an energy conference
in Houston. It assumes that "money
grows on trees and all research is
successful," said one of them,
Bryan J. Hannegan. "This is as
good as we think we can get, right
now." ...The 1990 Kyoto Protocol
on climate change, which the Bush administration
declined to support in 2001, calls
for emissions from large industrial
nations to be below 1990 levels by
about the year 2010. In an interview,
Dr. Hannegan said that cutting carbon
dioxide that much would mean pursuing
every option, including energy efficiency,
zero-carbon wind and sun power; new
nuclear reactors; coal plants that
capture and sequester their carbon;
and even plug-in hybrid electric cars,
which would require making more electricity
but would reduce carbon dioxide and
save gasoline....
15 February 2007. California Air
Resources Board (ARB) public
workshop on proposed regulations
to expand the existing Smog Index
Label to include a Global Warming
Index Label. See the Vehicle Emissions
Labeling web site located at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/labeling/labeling.htm. Other
interesting info at http://www.arb.ca.gov
7 February 2007. China
Says Rich Countries Should Take
Lead on Global Warming. By
JIM YARDLEY, NY Times. Excerpt:
BEIJING, Feb. 6 - China said Tuesday
that wealthier countries must take
the lead in curbing greenhouse
gas emissions and refused to say
whether it would agree to any mandatory
emissions limits that might hamper
its booming economy. Jiang Yu, a
spokeswoman for the Foreign Ministry,
said ... "It must
be pointed out that climate change
has been caused by the long-term
historic emissions of developed countries
and their high per capita emissions," she
said, adding that developed countries
have responsibilities for global
warming "that cannot be shirked." ...China
is the world's second largest emitter
of the greenhouse gases contributing
to climate change, .... Last November,
the International Energy Agency in
Paris predicted that China would
pass the United States in emissions
of carbon dioxide in 2009. ...Qin
Dahe, chief of the China Meteorological
Administration, told reporters ... "President
Hu Jintao has said that climate change
is not just an environmental issue
but also ... ultimately a development
issue." ..."As a developing
country that's growing rapidly and
has a big population, to thoroughly
transform the energy structure and
use clean energy would need a lot
of money," Mr. Qin said, according
to Reuters....
6 February 2007. SCIENTIST
AT WORK SUSAN SOLOMON - Melding
Science and Diplomacy to Run a
Global Climate Review. By
ANDREW C. REVKIN NY Times. Excerpt:
..."Thomas
Jefferson once said something like,
'Science is my passion, politics
my duty,' " Dr. Solomon, 51,
said Sunday.... "That's probably
how I think about it, too. Science
does have a duty, when called upon,
to provide information that's important
to society the best way it can." In
place of making expeditions to the
South Pole and Greenland, her old
stomping grounds, she spent chunks
of the last five years hunkered in
gray buildings in Beijing, New Delhi,
Marrakech and Paris running meeting
after meeting of experts from the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change. The panel was convened by
the United Nations in 1988 ... to
provide regular reviews of climate
science to governments to inform
policy choices. Dr. Solomon, a senior
scientist for the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, and
Qin Dahe, head of the Chinese meteorological
agency, were charged with generating
the fourth report and summary since
1990 of advances in climate science.
The final editing ... involved approval
by 113 governments. Several participants
credited Dr. Solomon with ensuring
that last-minute demands, particularly
from China and the United States,
did not derail the process or distort
the science. ...When a reporter asked
Dr. Solomon "to sum up what
kind of urgency this sort of report
should convey to policy makers," she
gave the furthest thing from a convenient
sound bite. "I can only give
you something that's going to disappoint
you, sir, and that is that it's my
personal scientific approach to say
it's not my role to try to communicate
what should be done," Dr. Solomon
said. "I believe that is a societal
choice. I believe science is one
input to that choice, and I also
believe that science can best serve
society by refraining from going
beyond its expertise.... Dr. Solomon,
who fell in love with science at
age 9 after watching Jacques Cousteau's
films about the sea, said she was
unfazed by the pressures of working
on the panel. She faces months of
additional work on reports related
to the summary. After that, she said,
she plans to take a little time off
and, for the first time, really,
enjoy the Rocky Mountains around
her base in Boulder, Colo. "I'm
going to learn how to fish," she
said.
2 February 2007. The Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change Report was
released. Download
the 21 page document. See also
NY Times article:
Science
Panel Calls Global Warming 'Unequivocal' By
ELISABETH ROSENTHAL and ANDREW C.
REVKIN, Published NY Times: February
3, 2007. Excerpt:
PARIS, Feb. 2 - In a grim and powerful
assessment of the future of the
planet, the leading international
network of climate scientists has
concluded for the first time that
global warming is "unequivocal" and
that human activity is the main
driver, "very likely" causing
most of the rise in temperatures
since 1950. ..."In our daily
lives we all respond urgently to
dangers that are much less likely
than climate change to affect the
future of our children," said
Achim Steiner, executive director
of the United Nations Environment
Program.... The report is the panel's
fourth assessment ... global climate
is likely to warm 3.5 to 8 degrees
Fahrenheit if carbon dioxide concentrations
in the atmosphere reach twice the
levels of 1750, before the Industrial
Revolution. ...It forecasts a [sea
level] rise of 7 to 23 inches by
2100 and concludes that seas will
continue to rise for at least 1,000
years to come. ...John P. Holdren,
an energy and climate expert at
Harvard, said the report "powerfully
underscores the need for a massive
effort to slow the pace of global
climatic disruption before intolerable
consequences become inevitable.
Since 2001, there has been a torrent
of new scientific evidence on the
magnitude, human origins and growing
impacts of the climatic changes
that are under way," said Mr.
Holdren, who is the president of
the American Association for the
Advancement of Science. "In
overwhelming proportions, this evidence
has been in the direction of showing
faster change, more danger and greater
confidence about the dominant role
of fossil-fuel burning and tropical
deforestation in causing the changes
that are being observed.".....
10 January 2007. Agency
Affirms Human Influence on Climate.
By ANDREW C. REVKIN NY Times. Excerpt:
... until yesterday, it appeared
that no news release on annual
climate trends out of the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
under the Bush White House had
said unequivocally that a buildup
of greenhouse gases was helping
warm the climate. The statement
came in a release that said 2006
was the warmest year for the 48
contiguous states since regular
temperature records began in 1895.
It surpassed the previous champion,
1998, a year heated up by a powerful
episode of the periodic warming of
the tropical Pacific Ocean by El
Ni–o. Last year, another El
Ni–o developed, but this time
a long-term warming trend from human
activities was said to be involved
as well. "A contributing factor
to the unusually warm temperatures
throughout 2006 also is the long-term
warming trend, which has been linked
to increases in greenhouse gases," the
release said, emphasizing that the
relative contributions of El Ni–o
and the human influence were not
known. A link between greenhouse
gases and climate change was also
made in a December news conference
by Dirk Kempthorne, the secretary
of the interior, as that agency proposed
listing polar bears as threatened
under the Endangered Species Act.
Still, the climate agency's shift
in language came as a surprise to
several public affairs officials
there. They said they had become
accustomed in recent years to having
any mention of a link between climate
trends and human activities played
down or trimmed when drafts of documents
went to the Commerce Department and
the White House for approval. ....
10 January 2007. Schwarzenegger
Orders Cuts in Emissions. By
JENNIFER STEINHAUER and FELICITY
BARRINGER. NY Times. Excerpt:
SACRAMENTO, Jan. 9 - Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger said Tuesday that
he would ask regulators to require
the state's petroleum refiners and
gasoline sellers to cut by 10 percent
the emissions of heat-trapping gases
associated with the production and
use of their products. ...It is the
first example of the practical impact
of a deal made last summer between
the Legislature and the governor
to reduce carbon dioxide emissions
by about 25 percent by 2020. The
transportation sector is responsible
for about 40 percent of the state's
carbon dioxide emissions, state officials
said, and cars make up about half
that amount. The 10 percent cut in
emissions would be accomplished,
experts said, largely through the
use of alternative fuels, like ethanol
and other gasoline blends, which
would be provided by the refineries
and other producers. Hal Harvey,
the environmental program director
for the William and Flora Hewlett
Foundation, called Mr. Schwarzenegger's
plan "a
really big deal." "In my
opinion there are no successful rules
anywhere in the world, except Brazil,
to get carbon out of fuels," Mr.
Harvey said. ...Mr. Harvey and Fred
Krupp, the president of Environmental
Defense, said they hoped that the
California approach would be a template
for other governments, whether in
state capitals, in Washington or
abroad. The plan, Mr. Harvey said,
is unusual in its focus on the so-called
cradle-to-grave emissions associated
with each fuel. In the case of ethanol,
this can mean carbon emissions generated
in the production of fertilizer,
in the planting and harvesting of
corn, in distilling the fuel and,
finally, in transporting it to the
distributor and burning it in a car.
Thus, two otherwise identical gallons
of ethanol could have different greenhouse-gas
ratings, if one were refined using
carbon-intensive coal-fired electricity,
while the other was refined using
relatively carbon-light electricity
from natural gas.....
Archive
of Past Articles for Chapter 8
TOP |
|
GSS
Climate Change Up-To-Date Homepage
Chapters
- What
is the Greenhouse Effect?
- What
is Global Warming?
- What
is the Controversy About?
- What's
So Special About CO2?
- How
Can We Measure Carbon Dioxide?
- Is
the Atmosphere Really Changing?
- What
are the Greenhouse Gases?
- What
are the Governments Doing about
Climate Change?
- What
do you think about Global
Climate Change
Kyoto
Treaty text
National
Assessment of the Potential
Consequences of Climate Variability
and Change -- is
a landmark in the
effort to understand what
climate change means for the
United States. The Assessment
was called for by a 1990 law,
and has been conducted under
the US Global Change Research
Program.
Climate
Change Education.org
Nature
Conservancy pages on Climate Change
Carbon
Mitigation Initiative - a joint project of Princeton
University, BP and the Ford Motor Company to find
solutions to the greenhouse and global warming problem.
Researchers are developing strategies to reduce global
carbon dioxide emissions that will be safe, effective,
and affordable.
ICLEI-Local
Governments for Sustainability was
founded in 1990 by local governments
at the United Nations Headquarters
in New York as the International
Council for Local Environmental
Initiatives (ICLEI). It's an
association of cities, towns, counties,
and local government associations
whose mission is to build and serve
a worldwide movement to achieve
tangible improvements in global
sustainability. Local City Councils
or Public Works Departments could
find the ICLEI web site useful,
if they do not already know about
it. There are thousands of cities
around the world (more than 600
in the U.S.) engaged in reducing
greenhouse gas emissions and making
other beneficial changes.
Climate and
Energy Publications from Rocky Mountain
Institute (RMI)
NOAA Global Climate Change page
RealClimate
- http://www.realclimate.org/ -..a
commentary site (blog) on climatology
by climate scientists. Provides quick
response to developing stories.
|